Expertise

Agentic AI safety

Governance for autonomous AI before it ships — loss-of-control, decision boundaries and human oversight.

The problem

Where the risk really sits

Agentic AI is being deployed into clinical decision support, drug discovery and other high-stakes workflows faster than governance matures. The risks are loss of control, unclear decision authority, and weak human-oversight mechanisms.

What DeTrust does

DeTrust conducts threat modelling and safety analysis of agentic AI in medical and pharmaceutical settings — examining loss-of-control risks, decision-authority boundaries and mechanisms for human oversight in collaborative AI environments.

The differentiator

Advice built by someone who engineered the methods

  • Active threat-modelling and safety-analysis projects on agentic AI in the medical and pharmaceutical sectors (Honorary Research Fellow, WMG).
  • Supervision of MSc research on risk-based agentic-AI governance and human–AI assurance.
  • Framing relevant to NHS-adjacent clinical AI and MHRA-regulated AI medical-device assurance.

Selected research

From the research programme

Illustrations from the research programme

Comparison of generative AI, AI agents and agentic AI
Generative AI vs. AI agents vs. agentic AI — how autonomy and risk escalate.
Mind map of AI safety objectives for agentic systems
AI-safety objectives for agentic systems.
MAESTRO threat modelling layers for agentic AI
MAESTRO threat-modelling layers for agentic AI.
Emerging agent internet protocol stack A2A, MCP, ACP
The emerging agent-internet protocol stack (A2A, MCP, ACP).

Intelligence-driven. Evidence first.

Tell the founder what you're working on. Every enquiry is read and answered personally.

Book a consultation